|
Yaw Shin Leong campaigned together with "Ah Poh" in
GE2001 and shares his post-GE reflections and his beliefs. He appeals
to fellow like-minded young Singaporeans to step forward to serve
fellow citizens of our beloved Singapore. He can be contacted at
yawsl@wp.org.sg
While GE2001 may disappoint many in Singapore and seems to signal
the death of oppositional politics, I beg to differ. Even though
it is well said that it is not the duty of the PAP to ensure a vibrant
opposition, this does not negate the necessity of political competition
in our country. This article will outline why GE2001 has further
reinforces my beliefs that what I am doing is RIGHT and also why
as a result of the competitive process of GE2001, Singaporeans stand
to benefit even more!
Right To Vote
Ever since the creation of the GRC system in 1988, many Singaporeans
while owning the right to vote never had the opportunity to exercise
it. This is a brilliant political maneuver that hits right at the
resource limitations of opposition parties. As a result, we are
the only country in the world whose government is formed even before
polling day! This makes a mockery of the Westminster parliamentary
system that we claim to be practicing. This is the soundest cry
for the existence of opposition parties and political competition.
The very presence of oppositional candidates offering themselves
and their services to residents gives you, the citizens, a chance
to exercise your rights.
Bargaining Power
Although the loss in Nee Soon East is an emotional setback at the
party level, our participation in the electoral process has borne
positive consequences for residents there at the national level.
The consequences are two-pronged: the rectification of a deficient
grassroots system; and the delivery of the ruling party's perennial
upgrading carrot. Even though "Ah Poh" lost, temples are
promised a more impartial process in their organization of the Seventh
Month festivities while residents will soon be enjoying a higher
standard of living under covered walkways and new hospital facilities.
Such are the benefits of our "Ah Poh Effect". Residents
outside Nee Soon East should not brush this issue aside as petty
grassroots politics. In fact, this episode has highlighted the need
for checks and balances at the grassroots level across constituencies
and also at the national level.
The benefits to residents can be more obviously witnessed in both
Hougang and Potong Pasir SMCs. It is because of the political competition
from Mr. Low Thia Khiang and Mr. Chiam See Tong that promises of
upgrading are extended to residents in exchange for merely diminishing
the victory margins of the two veterans! More shocking is the PAP's
promise of giving these two constituencies priority amongst all
other PAP constituencies in its upgrading plans.
To further illustrate, in Hougang & Potong Pasir, the PAP even
changes their conditions of carrot dangling. In 1997 GE, upgrading
was either PAP win to upgrade or nothing. This time round, even
if PAP looses, residents will still get upgrading provided that
the conditions are met! When voters do not bite PAP's carrot and
PAP is unable to achieve what it originally wants, PAP will then
change the conditions to be even more acceptable and more appealing
to the voters.
The above are the tangible benefits of political competition to
citizens. It is clear that it is only with political competition
that citizens are empowered with any bargaining power at all with
the ruling regime.
Accountability
However, bargaining power during elections can only go so far.
Without opposition in Parliament, the PAP government might or might
not honour their election promises. One example is that of Cheng
San GRC. It was promised upgrading in the 1997 General Elections,
but how many of the estates under the old Cheng San have been upgraded
today? And Cheng San no longer exists as a constituency. Bt Gombak
(Hill View Estate) was promised upgrading by the PAP during the
1997 elections. The shocking situation was that after the elections,
Hill View Estate was demolished Enbloc instead. The voters there
who were swayed by the PAP upgrading carrot, ended up having to
move out. To make matters worse, Hill View Estate has since become
part of a GRC uncontested in recent elections. With no contest,
even if the PAP did not keep their promise, what can the residents
do?
The Baptism Of Fire
The other benefit of political competition is even more fundamental
to the future of our country. The proverbial baptism of fire should
not be taken lightly. It is ironic that this lack of baptism of
fire is even a problem to begin with, because shouldn't all
MPs be subject to this ritual? For all candidates, having to contest
is the foundation to their political future because only by winning
the contest, will they be provided with the mandate to office. On
a personal level, having campaigned and reached out to the residents
will make a better leader out of a candidate. Ho Peng Kee himself
testified publicly that he is now a better politician. This can
only augur well for the future of Singapore. Cheerios to yet another
benefit of our "Ah Poh Effect"!
After the GE, PM Goh assigned top jobs to seven newcomers in our
new cabinet. While these newcomers are experts in their own fields,
but they have yet to prove themselves both at the grassroots and
national levels yet are already designated future leaders, this
mandate becomes even more critical to their legitimacy to lead.
In fact, this baptism of fire is their only mandate to legitimacy.
Sounder Policies
Not only does political competition result in better and tougher
leaders, it means better-formulated national policies. There are
two scenarios to this. Firstly, in the knowledge that issues are
bound to be scrutinized by opposition candidates during elections,
the ruling party will be on their toes in ensuring that national
policies are sound and acceptable. Secondly, if opposition candidates
are voted into Parliament, this enables direct participation and
scrutiny of policies, resulting in more accountability and transparency.
Alternative Voices
Lastly, political competition means the representation of alternative
voices and more diversity in the Parliament. The very act of wanting
to form a shadow cabinet from existing PAP ranks is their implicit
acknowledgement of the need for alternative voices. But this concept
is fundamentally lacking because all party members are governed
by the party whip despite other assurances. Your shadow sits as
you sit, stands as you stand, does as you do. So where is the alternative?
Clearly the shadow cabinet is not the answer to PAP's search
for alternative voices for this is the role of opposition MPs.
In the machinery of parliamentary democracy, political competition
is an indispensable component in its day-to-day running. So it is
that the opposition and its MPs are irreplaceable cogs in this machinery.
Singapore Needs You!
Having said all of the above, it is pointless to merely make it
an academic exercise pointing out factors and reasons with no follow
up action. I feel that it is a "chicken-egg-egg-chicken"
issue. If fellow Singaporeans wishes to have more credible opposition
members in Parliament, please do step forward! Please do not merely
lament at the sideline! To cite a famous quotation "Ask not
what the country can do for you, instead ask what you can do for
the country" Yes YOU! Singapore needs YOU!
Monday, February 11, 2002
|